BabelNet

bn:02852406n

Noun Named Entity

Categories: Extradition case law, Conflict of interest mitigation, Indictment and arrest of Augusto Pinochet, Bias, Amnesty International

R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte Pinochet R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet, R v.

R v Bow St Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate [2000] 1 AC 61, 119 and 147 is a set of three UK constitutional law judgments by the House of Lords that examined whether former Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet was entitled to claim state immunity from torture allegations made by a Spanish court and therefore avoid extradition to Spain. Wikipedia

Definitions

Relations

Sources

IS A

lawsuit

COUNTRY

United Kingdom

COURT

judicial functions of the House of Lords

SIGNIFICANT EVENT

indictment and arrest of Augusto Pinochet

Wikipedia

R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet

Wikidata

R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte

Wikipedia Redirections

Bartle and the Commissioner of Police for the Metropolis and Others, Ex Parte Pinochet, R v., Pinochet (No. 1), Pinochet case, Pinochet I, Pinochet II, Pinochet III, R. v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex p. Pinochet Ugarte (No.2), R v Bow St Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2), R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet, R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet (No. 2), R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate Ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, R v Bow Street Stipendiary Magistrate, ex p Pinochet (No 2)